Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Buffett Losing Credibility by Being Obama's Buddy

Thursday, 22 Sep 2011 08:28 AM

By Jacob Wolinsky

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
In 2010, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway was rated the most respected company in the United States, according to Harris Interactive.

Buffett’s Berkshire even beat out well respected companies like Steve Jobs’ Apple.

Buffett has made two catastrophic mistakes lately that will ruin his reputation.

The mistakes are both related, in a sense.

The first mistake was Buffett’s investment in Bank of America. While the investment might turn out to be a great one, especially since BAC is too big to fail. Buffett was criticized in the past for investing in companies like General Electric and Goldman Sachs, which later required a huge government bailout.

However the story with BAC is much worse: Buffett announced very shortly before his $5 billion investment in BAC that he would be hosting a fundraiser with President Barack Obama.

This clearly made the investment look political, because despite the government not holding a stake in the company, President Obama took swift action. After the fundraiser was announced, Obama managed to get New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman kicked off the state task force, which is currently investigating mortgage foreclosure abuses. This was a lifesaver for BAC, since the bank has $1 trillion pile of problem home mortgages according to Reuters.

The second Buffett fiasco was his call for the “millionaire's” tax. Obama quickly seized on the language and announced plans to implement the “Buffett tax” on all millionaires. This would not be a fault of Buffett; however.

The Wall Street Journal reported that Buffett gave the president explicit permission to use his name in Obama’s crusade against the rich.

Obama is playing populist politics, but there is a big chance of a backlash.

First, Buffett — despite his liberal views — is widely respected by the American people, who are mostly center-right. However, his calls for taxes are very divisive, and have even been criticized by Leon Cooperman, a successful $6 billion hedge fund manager, who donated money to Obama’s election campaign in 2008.

Second, the tax will produce little revenue. Obama’s new “Buffett tax” would raise about $37 billion to $66 billion. This is less than 5 percent of the budget deficit in 2009. If the tax is enacted, the American people will not only see the detrimental effect of less hiring, but also the continuing ballooning deficits despite milking the rich for every penny.

President Obama currently seems to have “The Sidam Touch.”

If Warren Buffett wants to retain the respect of the American people he should stop himself from being Obama’s “spokesman,” and cancel the upcoming fundraiser.

© 2013 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
You May Also Like
Around the Web
 
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved