Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

News Corp's Rupert Murdoch Not Interested in Buying Boston Globe

Wednesday, 27 Feb 2013 12:03 PM

By Alexandra Ward

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
News Corp. baron Rupert Murdoch has zero interest in buying the Boston Globe, and he "flat out" told reporters so on the red carpet at Sunday night's Academy Awards.


"The company has no interest in acquiring the Globe," a News Corp. source also told the Boston Herald, further quashing the speculation.

Rumors began swirling last week that the media mogul was interested in buying the Globe from the New York Times Co. A report in the News Corp.-owned Wall Street Journal said the Times was interested in drawing a bid from Murdoch, if only to drive up competing offers.

Urgent: High Gas Prices: Is it Obama's Fault? Vote Now

If Murdoch went after the Globe, it could present a tangled bureaucratic problem because of the Federal Communications Commission's ban on cross-ownership, according to the Herald. The ban prohibits the same person or company from controlling both a television station and a newspaper in the same market. Murdoch's joint interests would violate that rule, even if he takes measures to divide his print and broadcast entities.

"The rule still stands, even though the FCC is trying to get rid of it," newspaper analyst John Morton told the Herald. "It doesn't matter if it's owned separately, if it’s all under the same person’s control."

The New York Times Co.'s decision to sell its New England Media Group, which includes the Globe, is part of its strategy to embrace the new digital media landscape and shed traditional newspapers in favor of more mobile, social media, video, and other technology-centered opportunities.

"The Boston Globe and the Worcester Telegram & Gazette are outstanding newspapers and they and their related digital properties are well-managed leaders in their markets with real opportunities for future development," Times Co. CEO Mark Thompson said in a statement. "But given the differences between these businesses and The New York Times, we believe that a sale is in the best long-term interests of these properties and the employees who work for them as well as in the best interests of our shareholders."

Related stories:

Rupert Murdoch: Chinese Are Still Hacking the WSJ

Rupert Murdoch Labels Scientology 'Very Weird Cult'

How Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes Changed the World

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
You May Also Like
Around the Web
 
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved