Quantcast

Meltzer: Why Obamanomics Has Failed

Thursday, 01 Jul 2010 02:40 PM

By Julie Crawshaw

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Economist Allan Meltzer says the reason Obamanomics has failed is clear: uncertainty about regulations and future taxes is the top enemy of economic growth.

"Administration economists and their outside supporters neglected the longer-term costs and consequences of their actions," Meltzer writes in The Wall Street Journal. “The Obama economic team ignored history.”

The two most successful fiscal stimulus programs since World War II — under Kennedy-Johnson and Reagan — took the form of permanent reductions in corporate and marginal tax rates, Meltzer points out.

“Economist Arthur Okun, who had a major role in developing the Kennedy-Johnson program, later analyzed the effect of individual items,” Meltzer says. “He concluded that corporate tax reduction was most effective.”

The contrast between the Obama and Reagan administrations is striking, Meltzer notes. “Reagan reduced marginal and corporate tax rates and slowed the growth of non-defense spending,” notes Meltzer.

“Recovery began about a year later. After 18 months, the economy grew more than 9 percent and it continued to expand above trend rates.”

Almost daily, Meltzer observes, Obama “uses his rhetorical skill to castigate businessmen who have the audacity to hope for profitable opportunities.”

Meltzer says another defect of Obamanomics was that part of the increased spending authorized by the 2009 stimulus bill was held back. “Remember the oft-repeated claim that the spending would go for ‘shovel ready’ projects?” he asks. “That didn't happen, though spending will flow more rapidly now in an effort to lower unemployment and claim economic success during the fall election campaign.”

The New York Times reports that, during a recent visit to Wisconsin, Obama both criticized Republicans and argued the economy would have been worse without his spending and policy agenda.

“I just want everyone to remember — we’ve tried the other side’s theories,” he said. “We know what their ideas are. We know where they led us.”

“So now we’ve got a choice: We can return to what we know did not work, or we can build a stronger future. We can go backwards or we can go forward. And I don’t know about you, but I want to move forward in this country.”

© 2012 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Around the Web
You May Also Like

BlackRock Chief: Equity Buyback Shows Stocks Are Cheap

Thursday, 24 May 2012 11:30 AM

Laurence D. Fink, chairman and chief executive officer of BlackRock Inc., said the money manager s repurchase of stock f . . .

WSJ: Big Firms Tipped to Facebook Revenue Data Before IPO

Thursday, 24 May 2012 11:13 AM

Analysts at banks handling the Facebook initial public offering tipped off big investors that the iconic social network' . . .

Fed's Dudley: No Need for More Easing at This Time

Thursday, 24 May 2012 09:52 AM

The Federal Reserve doesn't need to stimulate the economy now, as growth is continuing and deflation poses less of a ris . . .

MONEYNEWS.COM
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved