Federal Stimulus Fails to Resolve Gaps in Internet Access

Monday, 25 Feb 2013 12:43 PM

By Alec Weisman

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Although federal stimulus programs have allocated $7.2 billion to provide high-speed Internet access to rural communities, some areas of the country remain without access because of inefficiency and waste, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Other areas, meanwhile have gained a disproportionate share of attention and money from the programs, leading to duplicative high-speed services.

Meanwhile some states, including California and Mississippi, failed to receive federal funds due to faulty information.

These complaints are driving a House subcommittee on communications and technology to hold a hearing later this week on whether the broadband stimulus money was put to good use in an effort to determine if taxpayers are getting a good return on their investment.

As part of the 2009 $800 billion stimulus package, the government allocated $4.7 billion to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and an additional $2.5 billion to the Department of Agriculture's Rural Utilities Service to expand broadband access.

Both agencies claim their programs have been largely successful, according to the Journal.

The money has helped develop 86,000 miles of broadband infrastructure connecting 12,000 town hubs, schools, hospitals, libraries, and other important institutions.


In addition, the Federal Communications Commission says the amount of Americans lacking high-speed service has fallen to 19 million, only about 6 percent of the population, down from 26 million a year ago.

But problems do persist.

In Dixie County, Fla., for example, a private-government partnership received $31 million in high-speed grant money, raising hopes that the digital divide would soon be a thing of the past. But the program was ditched when county officials disagreed over how to implement the service to both homes and businesses.

In Colorado, the story was different. A consortium there that got more than $101 million has been criticized for building duplicative services.



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web

Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
You May Also Like
Around the Web

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved