Exchanges Ask SEC to Delay High-Speed Access Rule to November

Tuesday, 21 Jun 2011 03:05 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
U.S. exchanges asked their regulator to delay, pending further clarification, new rules that would ban so-called "naked access" to markets, where brokers rent their IDs to unlicensed high-frequency traders trying to gain an edge of microseconds.

NYSE Euronext, Nasdaq OMX Group Inc., BATS Global Markets and Direct Edge asked that the ban be delayed until Nov. 30, from July 14, according to a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission, obtained by Reuters.

The new rule, adopted in the months after last year's "flash crash," would eliminate unfettered access to U.S. stock markets for unlicensed firms, and require brokers to protect against potential mishaps that could destabilize the high-speed electronic marketplace.

The exchanges said they wanted a clearer interpretation of the plan, listing some 35 questions mostly related to how broker dealers would comply with the rule that was proposed in January last year and adopted in November.

"In making this request, the exchanges believe there are a number of interpretive issues arising under Rule 15c3-5 that should be resolved with respect to routing broker-dealers through further discussions with the Commission," the June 20 letter said.

The four exchanges, noting they made the delay request on behalf of broker dealers, said they were also concerned the costs of maintaining the new risk checks "may be materially in excess" of the SEC's initial estimates.

In November, the regulator said the plan would cost the brokerage industry around $100 million to implement and $100 million to maintain annually. Under the rule, brokers would have to implement controls to prevent the entry of orders that appear erroneous or exceed credit and capital thresholds.

Broker-dealers would also have to develop and maintain a system for reviewing the effectiveness of their risk management controls and for promptly addressing any issues.

COMPLICATED QUESTIONS

In the letter, sent to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro and others at the government agency, the exchanges asked an array of questions including what exactly is the "short period of time" in which brokers must measure potentially erroneous orders, which orders should be exempt, and how this can be automated.

The questions delved deep into the complicated nature of the stock market, where rules ensure that investors get the best possible price for stocks no matter where that bid or ask may be located. There are dozens of U.S. exchanges and alternative trading venues.

Does a "thorough due diligence" review "require brokers to request the policies and procedures of every customer to whom it provides market access?" the exchanges asked.

"If so, what standards are envisioned for evaluating such policies and procedures?"

The SEC did not immediately comment Tuesday.

High-frequency traders, whose computers can send thousands of buy and sell orders a second, pay brokers to get the quickest possible access to exchange servers and databases.

The May 6, 2010, flash crash, in which the Dow Jones industrial average plunged some 700 points in minutes before snapping back up, amplified criticism of such traders, although regulators later said they were not primarily to blame.

The impending naked access ban has prompted some high-frequency traders to convert into formal broker-dealers (BDs), while some existing brokers formed new BD units to secure additional licenses.

© 2014 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web

Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 

You May Also Like
Around the Web

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved